Re: Safe memory allocation functions

On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I do think that "safe" is the wrong suffix.  Maybe palloc_soft_fail()
>> or palloc_null() or palloc_no_oom() or palloc_unsafe().
>
> I liked palloc_noerror() better myself FWIW.
Voting for palloc_noerror() as well.
-- 
Michael