Re: [BUGS] [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message.
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTBeEg1TFrZ+8uUWRnKVueDja+_LyTO2esPHRPQQQH8uQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAMmessage. (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] [PATCH] Fixed malformed error message on malformed SCRAM message.
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > These messages look all wrong to me. >> >> So your complain would be to do the following for each error message >> that uses parenthesis to include details? Like that I suppose: >> --- a/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c >> +++ b/src/backend/libpq/auth-scram.c >> @@ -283,11 +283,13 @@ pg_be_scram_exchange(void *opaq, char *input, >> int inputlen, >> if (inputlen == 0) >> ereport(ERROR, >> (errcode(ERRCODE_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION), >> - (errmsg("malformed SCRAM message (empty message)")))); >> + errmsg("malformed SCRAM message"), >> + errdetail("Empty message."))); > > Yeah, but along the lines of errdetail("The message is empty.") Okay. What do you think about the attached patch then? Does it address your concerns about the format of those error messages? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: