Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqT4BBcZpMxQoPzTHL9NVskLXoc61+qF2YMrJMEf3LyZzA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On July 9, 2015 9:13:20 PM GMT+02:00, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Unfortunately I don't know what that means about the API. Does it mean >>that none of the functions declared in any .h file can have their >>signatures changed? But new functions can be added? > > That's the safest way. Sometimes you can decide that a function can not sanely be called by external code and thus changethe signature. But I'd rather not risk or here, IRS quite possible that one pod these is used by a extension. Where are we on this? Could there be a version for <= 9.2? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: