Re: [GENERAL] Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETEdone between standby_redo and the end of backup
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETEdone between standby_redo and the end of backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqT3S_wG3J3GXeaXDgeS1sdwgz52F=Ze+uBbrWX89EO4wQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE done between standby_redo and the end of backup (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
[GENERAL] Re: Is there possibility btree_redo with XLOG_BTREE_DELETE donebetween standby_redo and the end of backup
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Wup, sorry, I quoted the wrong thread mentioning > btree_xlog_delete_get_latestRemovedXid. The right one is > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/00F0B2CEF6D0CEF8A90119D4%40eje.credativ.lan > > and the patch is > > Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Branch: master [0e0f43d6f] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_6_STABLE Release: REL9_6_0 [3fc489cb3] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_5_STABLE Release: REL9_5_5 [c40bb1155] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_10 [f4e40537e] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_15 [baf111d31] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_2_STABLE Release: REL9_2_19 [823df401d] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > Branch: REL9_1_STABLE Release: REL9_1_24 [e3439a455] 2016-08-31 08:52:13 -0400 > > Prevent starting a standalone backend with standby_mode on. Ahh. This one... Thanks. That may be related, but no way to say if that's related with this report as there is no information that a standalone backend is used. Perhaps that's the case though. So it could be possible as well that the set of custom patches mentioned is fishy. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: