Re: Minmax indexes
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Minmax indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqT0LVTH5p4VxyLmy-QV7tRGRbMZV49Ge1EFXtaOALPFFg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Minmax indexes (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 08/07/2014 08:38 AM, Oleg Bartunov wrote: >> +1 for BRIN ! >> >> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 7 August 2014 14:53, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> A better description would be "block range index" since we are >>> indexing a range of blocks (not just one block). Perhaps a better one >>> would be simply "range index", which we could abbreviate to RIN or >>> BRIN. > > How about Block Range Dynamic indexes? > > Or Range Usage Metadata indexes? > > You see what I'm getting at: > > BRanDy > > RUM > > ... to keep with our "new indexes" naming scheme ... Not the best fit for kids, fine for grad students. BRIN seems to be a perfect consensus, so +1 for it. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: