Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSy4ZAD1BA-RYyfQv1Faetyfx7SmNtgeS1=Q5jRSfhU+w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > Looking again at the code after Andres' interrupt-handling patch series, I > got confused by the fact that there are several wait-retry loops in > different layers, and reading and writing works slightly differently. > > I propose the attached, which pulls all the wait-retry logic up to > secure_read() and secure_write(). This makes the code a lot more > understandable. Are you sure that it is a good idea to move the check of port->noblock out of be_tls_[read|write] to an upper level? ISTM that we should set errno and n to respectively EWOULDBLOCK and -1 in be_tls_[write|read] when port->noblock and do nothing otherwise. In your patch those values are set even if the port is in block mode. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: