Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSw6CNQMiN0ohiqck7syGnJpz61bk-=nbFf71mCdpwyDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:47 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think I understood your concern after some offlist discussion and it >> is primarily due to the inheritance related check which can skip the >> generation of gather paths when it shouldn't. So what might fit >> better here is a straight check on the number of base rels such that >> allow generating gather path in set_rel_pathlist, if there are >> multiple baserels involved. I have used all_baserels which I think >> will work better for this purpose. > > Yes, that looks a lot more likely to be correct. > > Let's see what Tom thinks. Moved to next CF for extra reviews. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: