Re: psql: add \pset true/false
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql: add \pset true/false |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSnivZ=aoBoK5XF5Q3b=xDA0T-Fd3S-E-1h=Dn190fqbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql: add \pset true/false (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql: add \pset true/false
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSXcdM-5nFWDf8zuKmW8j_ooE6zYRqYQasp0fjKxKDX2A@mail.gmail.com> >> > Regarding the patch, I >> > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft >> > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need. >> > Thoughts? >> >> Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do >> something like the following for the original objective. > > Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread.. So, marking the patch as rejected? Any objections? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: