Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSk3fb3ea8pGmN_L3wp3Gf38JNsduxmUj-or9iJG+i6xQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TAP / recovery-test fs-level backups, psql enhancements etc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 05:08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Patches 0004 and 0007 remain. > > For readers who're not following closely that's the filtering support for > RecursiveCopy and the support for taking filesystem-level backups in > PostgresNode that uses it. I am still not sure that the filter for pg_log by default is that useful but... >> I think 0007 is uncontroversial; I >> reworked 0004 a bit and gave it to someone else to finish a couple of >> didn't I didn't quite like -- hopefully she'll be submitting a new >> version soonish. Once we have that I'm happy to push them too. > > Great, thanks. No objections from here as well for the feature itself. I am glad to see interest in extending the current infrastructure, and just wondering what kind of tests are going to show up. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: