Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSjx_F-+OY-5LKchzEq4r0=+jXhs99WWB_RySp7iGRYKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor Perl test code (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> BTW, not the fault of this patch in particular, but this example points >>> up the complaint I've had right along about how opaque TAP test failures >>> are. How did you dig down to see that error message? > >> Well, it showed up on my terminal... > > Not on mine, as per the extract I showed. Probably a Perl version > difference, but I don't think we can exactly write off RHEL6 as an > uninteresting obsolete distribution. (The Perl here is 5.10.1.) Possible. On OSX 10.8: $ perl --version This is perl 5, version 16, subversion 2 (v5.16.2) built for darwin-thread-multi-2level (with 3 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: