Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSgP_DBEUF_SBBsfYmHdKkJHrVdzcjACz_JAi4xZH411Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] coverage analysis improvements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Here is a patch series with some significant reworking and adjusting of > how the coverage analysis tools are run. The result should be that the > "make coverage" runs are faster and more robust, the results are more > accurate, and the code is simpler. Please see the individual patches > for details. > > I have replaced "make coverage-html" with "make coverage" (but kept the > previous name for compatibility), since the old meaning of the latter > has gone away and was never very useful. Other than that, the usage of > everything stays the same. > > I will add it to the commit fest. Testing with different versions of > tools would be especially valuable. Patch 0001 fails to apply as of c629324. Which versions of lcov and gcov did you use for your tests? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: