Re: Bug in pg_dump
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSfqPR-oWoGoek+JJv3d+mnz53fu44Fu2g4EOpyQCFf4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in pg_dump (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > - set up basic scaffolding for TAP tests in src/bin/pg_dump Agreed. > - write a Perl function that can create an extension on the fly, given > name, C code, SQL code I am perplex about that. Where would the SQL code or C code be stored? In the pl script itself? I cannot really see the advantage to generate automatically the skeletton of an extension based on some C or SQL code in comparison to store the extension statically as-is. Adding those extensions in src/test/modules is out of scope to not bloat it, so we could for example add such test extensions in t/extensions/ or similar, and have prove_check scan this folder, then install those extensions in the temporary installation. > - add to the proposed t/001_dump_test.pl code to write the extension > - add that test to the pg_dump test suite > Eventually, the dump-and-restore routine could also be refactored, but > as long as we only have one test case, that can wait. Agreed on all those points. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: