Re: [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSeg2rU6AkaYZUMN_tz00q6Bx+EQ7X7kbWZoc1kx5VXpw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ? ("Shinoda, Noriyoshi" <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_sequences bug ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Shinoda, Noriyoshi <noriyoshi.shinoda@hpe.com> wrote: > I tried a committed pg_sequences for PostgreSQL 10dev (https://commitfest.postgresql.org/12/771/). > I found that when multiple users create SEQUENCE, I cannot see the pg_sequences catalog. I think that should work justlike pg_tables. > > $ psql -U user1 > postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE seq1 ; > CREATE SEQUENCE > > $ psql -U user2 > postgres=> CREATE SEQUENCE seq2 ; > CREATE SEQUENCE > postgres=> SELECT * FROM pg_sequences ; > ERROR: permission denied for sequence seq1 > > Apparently it seems that the pg_sequence_last_value function included in the pg_sequences view definition cannot be executed. > Is this behavior supposed? That seems user-unfriendly to me. We could perhaps just use has_sequence_privilege() and return NULL if the caller of pg_sequences does not have select and usage access to a given sequence? Please see the patch attached. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: