Re: [BUGS] BUG #14636: pg_dumpall -d

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:08 AM,  <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
> Pulled the nightly build of Postgres 10:
>         2017-04-30 20:30:26
> Testing dump/restore from a 9.6 instance to the 10 instance. Tried dumping
> the globals using pg_dumpall and connected using:
> aklaver@tito:~> /usr/local/pgsql10/bin/pg_dumpall -g -d postgres -U postgres
> -p 5432 -f production_globals.sql
> pg_dumpall: missing "=" after "postgres" in connection info string
>
> This not what I usually do and when I used -l it worked as expected. The bug
> is that the docs say:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/app-pg-dumpall.html
>
> "-d connstr
> --dbname=connstr
>
>     Specifies parameters used to connect to the server, as a connection
> string. See Section 33.1.1 for more information.
>
>     The option is called --dbname for consistency with other client
> applications, but because pg_dumpall needs to connect to many databases,
> database name in the connection string will be ignored. Use -l option to
> specify the name of the database used to dump global objects and to discover
> what other databases should be dumped.
> "
>
> Instead an error is raised.

The documentation and the behavior look correct to me. You did not
specify a correct connection string using -d, and just used a database
name. If you want to have a database name ignored in the connection
string defined by -d, you need to use "dbname=postgres".
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs