Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How do you plug in that with OpenSSL? Are you suggesting to use a set
>> of undef definitions in the new header in the same way as pgcrypto is
>> doing, which is rather ugly? Because that's what the deal is about in
>> this patch.
>
> Perhaps that justifies renaming them -- although I would think the
> fact that they are static would prevent conflicts -- but why reorder
> them and change variable names?

Yeah... Perhaps I should not have done that, which was just for
consistency's sake, and even if the new reordering makes more sense
actually...
-- 
Michael