Re: [HACKERS] issue about the streaming replication
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] issue about the streaming replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSWc=tM2kniOAXfcGzPdDLTfaaX77FRBReQtr86LXtRUw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] issue about the streaming replication (Jinhua Luo <luajit.io@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] issue about the streaming replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Jinhua Luo <luajit.io@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this diverge scenario is common, because it's likely the > master would crash due to some hardware issue (e.g. power off) which > would cause some committed transaction has not yet synced to slave, > while the slave would be promoted to new master and accepts new > transactions, then how to recover the old master? Moreover, how to > recover the data on old master which is missing on new master? pg_rewind (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/app-pgrewind.html) has been designed with exactly this scenario in mind, aka recycling a past master as a slave to a promoted node. Have you looked at it? What you are trying to do is much likely going to create corruptions on your systems, so I am not surprised that you see inconsistency failures, what you are seeing is pretty much the tip of hte iceberg. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: