Re: standalone backend PANICs during recovery
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: standalone backend PANICs during recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSTN3Q_qz1Xu3=nEW5v_=AN=cXoPFBLTvW8SBEsBR42DQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: standalone backend PANICs during recovery (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: standalone backend PANICs during recovery
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> wrote: >>> That said, i'm okay if --single is not intended to bring up a hot standby. >>> There are many other ways to debug such problems. > >> This patch is still on the CF app: >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/610/ >> Even after thinking about it, my opinion is still the same. Let's >> prevent a standalone backend to start if it sees recovery.conf. >> Attached is a patch and the CF entry is switched as ready for >> committer to move on. > > Hm, StartupXLOG seems like a pretty random place to check that, especially > since doing it there requires an extra stat() call. Why didn't you just > make readRecoveryCommandFile() error out? Well, the idea is to do the check before doing anything on PGDATA and leave it intact, particularly the post-crash fsync(). -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: