Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSSHONNoH4dyj4f_1roDct9-VemT+Z18JYDZ+MH_sd7LQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: recovery_target_time and standby_mode (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> When the recovery_target_time is reached, switch to streaming >>> replication and stay a standby. >> >> Then shouldn't he just not specify a recovert_target at all? That's >> the default behaviour for standby_mode on, the whole point of >> recovery_target is to specify when to stop recovery and leave standby >> mode, no? > Agreed with Greg, once a target recovery is switched the node gets out > of recovery. What the user should have done here is not specify > recovery_target_time in the standby's recovery.conf such as it follows > the master through streaming. Just adding: ... On the new timeline that master is bumping to. If the standby already replayed of the point where WAL forked on master, then the standby should be rewinded. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: