Re: Adding flag LDFLAGS for compilation of regression tests
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding flag LDFLAGS for compilation of regression tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSNJKGE4dPf6LZQMVkVs7SeStpOiy3tsi3nbwn7SqqFZQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding flag LDFLAGS for compilation of regression tests (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding flag LDFLAGS for compilation of regression tests
|
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: >> On 03/17/2014 03:18 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >>> Hmm, PG_CONFIG is currently tied to the --with-libpq configure option, >>> so that's only available if you build the driver with libpq. Would need >>> to separate that into a separate option. >> >> >> Then again, if building with libpq, then there's no reason to *not* use the >> PG_CONFIG from configure. Committed a patch to do that. If you configure >> --without-libpq, then you still need to pass the path to PG_CONFIG manually >> at the command line when building the regression suite, i.e "cd test; make >> installcheck PG_CONFIG=<path>". But it's still an improvement that you don't >> need it when building with libpq, which is the default. > If the code tree of pgodbc gains in complexity in the future, > something that I doubt will happen in a close future, we could still > revisit that. But for now, what you have pushed is fine and enough > IMO. So let's stick with that. By the way, could you push as well the patch attached? test/Makefile is now automatically generated by configure and it is not ignored in the code tree. Regards, -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: