Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSKyy61HaZMa9j3FxqtD9xSuUJfa_nqciTdCuBaeyW2uA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Assertion failure when streaming logical changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:46 PM, Andres Freund<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andres@2ndquadrant.com" target="_blank">andres@2ndquadrant.com</a>></span> wrote:<br/><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Yea, itreally looks like the above commit is to "blame". The new xmin<br /> tracking infrastructure doesn't know about the historicalsnapshot...<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br /></font></span></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">Ithink that we need a better regression coverage here... For example, we could add some tap tests intest_decoding to test streaming of logical changes. This would help in the future to detect such problems via the buildfarm.<br/>-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature">Michael<br /></div></div></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: