Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSCf4yFfo499EHfXHyjquBE7AEZc80bFnj+Qw_jvcvnCw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Tomas Vondra > <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Attached is v2 of the patch, that >> >> (a) adds explicit fsync on the parent directory after all the rename() >> calls in timeline.c, xlog.c, xlogarchive.c and pgarch.c >> >> (b) adds START/END_CRIT_SECTION around the new fsync_fname calls >> (except for those in timeline.c, as the START/END_CRIT_SECTION is >> not available there) >> >> The patch is fairly trivial and I've done some rudimentary testing, but I'm >> sure I haven't exercised all the modified paths. > > I would like to have an in-depth look at that after finishing the > current CF, I am the manager of this one after all... Could you > register it to 2016-01 CF for the time being? I don't mind being > beaten by someone else if this someone has some room to look at this > patch.. And please feel free to add my name as reviewer. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: