Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqS9inxOr0Q2ULgmeOS-C0Mf8AKCT_ZFtNeRNeEwQb1etQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Ashutosh Bapat >> <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> > The previous patch would not compile on the latest HEAD. Here's updated >> > patch. >> >> Perhaps unsurprisingly, this doesn't apply any more. But we have >> bigger things to worry about. >> > > Here's updated patch. I didn't use version numbers in file names in my > previous patches. I am starting from this onwards. Ashutosh, others, this thread has been stalling for more than 1 month and a half. There is a new patch that still applies (be careful of whitespaces btw), but no reviews came in. So what should we do? I would tend to move this patch to the next CF because of a lack of reviews. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: