Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqS7NALWcXLGjtmLXkS7jHWpMM+gxt9OYwmmhbNkPRAt5w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > Initially, I had naively set wal_consistency_check = all before running > make installcheck and then had to wait for a long time to confirm that WAL > generated by the gin test indeed caused consistency check failure on the > standby with the v1 patch. wal_consistency_check = gin would have saved you a lot of I/O. > But I can see Sawada-san's point that there should be some way for > developers writing code that better had gone through WAL consistency > checking facility to do it without much hassle. But then again, it may > not be that frequent to need that. Yeah, I have my own set of generic scripts for that. There could be a set of modules out of the main check-world, the risk that those finish rotting is high though... -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: