Re: pg_dump -Fd and compression level
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump -Fd and compression level |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqS1v3XLLcnDDonoo79VfTfTgrao5PyoJPMQjXBVvOOS4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump -Fd and compression level (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dump -Fd and compression level
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > On 07/25/2015 03:20 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> >> On 07/25/2015 02:34 AM, Marc Mamin wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>>>> >>>>> Hmm. Yeah. It looks like commit >>>>> a7ad5cf0cfcfab8418000d652fa4f0c6ad6c8911 >>>>> changed from using the default compression for libz to using the >>>>> compression set in pg_dump options, which defaults to 0. This actually >>>>> seems like the right thing to do, but it certainly should have been >>>>> called out much more forcefully in release notes, and arguably should >>>>> not have been changed in stable releases. Not sure what we do about it >>>>> now. >>> >>> really 0? wouldn't that mean no compression at all? >> >> >> No, that's not right either. The default should be Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION, >> so we shouldn't actually see a difference in the default case. And it is >> definitely compressing some. So I'm now puzzled by what you're seeing. >> >> > > > OK, I have got this worked out. I'll have a bug fix shortly. So you are basically planning to switch to Z_BEST_SPEED instead of Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION where needed for the default code path? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: