Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqS0pq2OZAE=3vvOkC3snQAny5k9Umvt9XOR=61wqr=haA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config
Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:peter_e@gmx.net" target="_blank">peter_e@gmx.net</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On3/25/15 1:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:<br /> > Well, I have no other cases than ones of the type mentionedupthread,<br /> > and honestly I am fine as long as we do not apply maths to a version<br /> > string. Soattached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in<br /> > Makefile.global.<br /><br /></span>How would you make use of thisin an extension makefile?<br /></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">One use case is regression testlist filtering depending on backend version.<br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature">Michael<br /></div></div></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: