Re: WAL consistency check facility
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqS-=0jh2+u7iV6TOmyt6E0V+PPVUj_rUcDCrM9CdUGo0g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL consistency check facility (Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL consistency check facility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote: > Thoughts? There are still a couple of things that this patch makes me unhappy, particularly the handling of the GUC with the xlogreader flags. I am not sure if I'll be able to look at that again within the next couple of weeks, but please be sure that this is registered in the next commit fest. You could for example do that by changing the patch from "Returned with Feedback" to "Moved to next CF" in the commit fest app. Be sure as well to spend a couple of cycles in reviewing patches. Usually for one patch sent, that's one patch of equal difficulty to review, and there are many patch still waiting for feedback. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: