Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>> v40 is yet another rebase.
>
> Thanks.  Committed after removing an unnecessary parameter from the
> coerceToXXX() functions.
>
> I guess the question here is whether we want the part-c patch, which
> removes the historical \setrandom syntax.  That's technically no
> longer needed since we now can use random() as a function directly
> inside \set commands, but we might want it anyway for backward
> compatibility.
>
> Anybody have an opinion on that?

+1 for nuking it. That's not worth the trouble maintaining it.
-- 
Michael