Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRvXvaAJ_PLqJt5tagwR4FwM3Wfz9jnkStOg50rYoF9Gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I've marked the CF entry closed. However, I'm not sure if we're quite >> done with this thread. Weren't we going to adjust nbtree and hash to >> be more aggressive about labeling their metapages as REGBUF_STANDARD? > > I have already posted the patches [1] for the same in this thread and > those are reviewed [2][3] as well. I have adjusted the comments as per > latest commit. Please find updated patches attached. Confirmed. Setting those makes sense even if REGBUF_WILL_INIT is set, at least for page masking. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: