Re: DICE News Article Comment
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DICE News Article Comment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRqbk+vnwFf3WCrhdKfBPCi1qRKhBNyWUuKNzmiu+De_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DICE News Article Comment (Joshua Kramer <joskra42.list@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DICE News Article Comment
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Joshua Kramer <joskra42.list@gmail.com> wrote: > Did anyone catch this comment? > > http://news.dice.com/2015/03/19/why-i-choose-postgresql-over-mysqlmariadb/#comment-2638712 > > Given the stories I've heard about Postgres working well in that type of > application, I'm wondering what out-of-the-ordinary thing that application > did to cause Postgres to lock up as he said it did. This comment does not mention the version used, but it mentions the JSON features of a "couple of months back", so I would guess that they tried with 9.4.0 and jsonb. Now I recall as well the following bug: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140731233051.GN17765@andrew-ThinkPad-X230 And it has been fixed by Alvaro here, included in 9.4.1: commit: 0e3a1f71dfb31527c07a80ccba815b2928d70d8f author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:52:27 -0300 Grab heavyweight tuple lock only before sleeping So perhaps it was the problem they faced? Regards, -- Michael
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: