Re: [BUGS] BUG #14682: row level security not work with partitioned table

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/2017 02:44 PM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/06/2017 11:57 AM, Mike Palmiotto wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Unless Robert objects, I'll work with Mike to get a fix posted and
>>>>>> committed in the next day or two.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be great.  Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> I have the updated patch with rowsecurity regression tests and rebased
>>>> on master. I've run these and verified locally by feeding
>>>> rowsecurity.sql to psql, but have yet to get the full regression suite
>>>> passing -- it's failing on the constraints regtest and then gets stuck
>>>> in recovery. Undoubtedly something to do with my
>>>> configuration/environment over here. I'm working through those issues
>>>> right now. In the meantime, if you want to see the regression tests as
>>>> they stand, please see the attached patch.
>>>
>>> The constraints test passes here, so presumably something you borked
>>> locally. I only see a rowsecurity failure, which is not surprising since
>>> your patch does not include the changes to expected output ;-)
>>> Please resend with src/test/regress/expected/rowsecurity.out included.
>>
>> It was indeed an issue on my end. Attached are the rowsecurity
>> regression tests and the expected out. Unsurprisingly, all tests pass,
>> because I said so. :)
>>
>> Let me know if you want me to make any revisions.
>
>
> Thanks Mike. I'll take a close look to verify output correctnes, but I
> am concerned that the new tests are unnecessarily complex. Any other
> opinions on that?

Some tests would be good to have. Now, if I read those regression
tests correctly, this is using 10 relations where two would be enough,
one as the parent relation and one as a partition. Then policies apply
on the parent relation. The same kind of policy is defined 4 times,
and there is bloat with GRANT and ALTER TABLE commands.

+SELECT * FROM part_document;
+ did | cid | dlevel |      dauthor      |         dtitle
+-----+-----+--------+-------------------+-------------------------
+   1 |  11 |      1 | regress_rls_bob   | my first novel
Adding an "ORDER BY did" as well here would make the test output more
predictable.
-- 
Michael