Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRev_wK4k39hQBpQZRQ17v29guxfobnnmTYT_-hUU67BA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:52 AM, Jason Petersen <jason@citusdata.com> wrote: >> While I understand the above workload is nonsensical, given the non-transactional behavior of ALTER SEQUENCE statements,previous PostgreSQL versions did not produce an error. It is likely applications have been coded with that assumptionand will not deal well with the new behavior. > > Yes, that's a bug. > >> Having poked around the code a bit, I see the functions to access for sequence state have changed; I’m assuming this isan unintended side-effect of that change. >> >> I haven’t worked up a patch myself, but I have some hope someone more familiar with the underlying changes could makequick work of this. > > I am working on it, will send a patch soon. My first intuition is that > this is some wild lock issue. I am checking as well other code paths. > An open item has been added for the time being. So things are broken for sequences since commit 1753b1b0 (adding Peter in CC) that has changed the way sequence metadata is handled. The failure happens in CatalogTupleUpdate() which uses simple_heap_update() that caller can only use if updates are concurrent safe. But since 1753b1b0 that is not true as the sequence is locked with AccessShareLock. The correct answer is to use a stronger lock, but not something that would block attempts to read next sequence values as it is assumed that ALTER SEQUENCE should be non-disruptive. Hence I think that ShareUpdateExclusiveLock is a good match what what we are looking for here: protect concurrent updates of the sequence metadata for other ALTER SEQUENCE commands but not block other transactions reading this data. Attached is a patch to address the issue. And looking at things deeper... I am seeing at least one other ALTER command that is not concurrent safe... I'll keep that for another thread because it is an older bug. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
Вложения
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: