Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRdy1H+FD48Rkz9a_uvUZuOy7b6=h95EZXB6dXLMLYPXA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: >> As someone mentioned, forcing a user to install an extension makes >> the deprecation visible. Another option would be to have the backend >> spit out a WARNING the first time you access anything that's >> deprecated. Both of those are pertinent reminders to people that >> they need to change their tools. > > Ugh. Please, no. Hacking up the backend to recognize that a given > query is referring to a deprecated view and then throwing a warning on > it is just plain ugly. > > Let's go one step further, and throw an ERROR if someone tries to query > these views instead. FWIW, I am of the opinion to just nuke them as the "soft of" deprecation period has been very long. Applications should have switched to pg_authid and pg_roles long ago already. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: