Re: WAL consistency check facility

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Kuntal Ghosh
> <kuntalghosh.2007@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've updated the patch for review.
>
> Thank you for the new patch. This will be hopefully the last round of
> reviews, we are getting close to something that has an acceptable
> shape.

One last thing: in XLogRecordAssemble(), could you enforce the value
of info at the beginning of the routine when wal_consistency[rmid] is
true? And then use the value of info to decide if include_image is
true or not? The idea here is to allow callers of XLogInsert() to pass
by themselves XLR_CHECK_CONSISTENCY and still have consistency checks
enabled for a given record even if wal_consistency is false for the
rmgr of the record happening. This would be potentially useful for
extension and feature developers when debugging some stuff, for some
builds compiled with a DEBUG flag, or whatever.
-- 
Michael