Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRZWVjuGi4kmLVhJdQ7JdKUbPtMWRrJXBiA2G6UnDq9ag@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking
LSN progress
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> At Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:00:15 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in<20160930.140015.150178454.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> >>> I don't see no problem in setting progressAt in XLogInsertRecord. >>> But I doubt GetProgressRecPtr is harmful, especially when >> >> But I suspect that GetProgressRecPtr could be harmful. > > Well, you can maximize its effects by doing NUM_XLOGINSERT_LOCKS == > nproc and reducing checkpoint_timeout. That's what I did but.. Note: I am moving this patch to next CF. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: