Re: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRX+3P4qk66yKE4=8VOrK05sFUy6y7r-44T8FefeY=KKg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually
Re: [PATCH] Allow TAP tests to be run individually |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 11 November 2016 at 18:13, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> Please backpatch to at least 9.6 since it's trivial and we seem to be >>> doing that for TAP. 9.5 and 9.4 would be nice too :) >> >> Yes please! > > No immediate takers, so adding to CF. > > I've taken the liberty of adding you as a reviewer based on your > response and the simplicity of the patch. if you get the chance to > test and verify please set ready for committer. I don't mind. This patch uses the following pattern: $(or $(PROVE_TESTS),t/*.pl) While something more spread in Postgres source would be something like that: $(if $(PROVE_TESTS),$(PROVE_TESTS),t/*.pl) It seems to me that we'd prefer that for consistency, but I see no reason to not keep your patch as well. I am marking that as ready for committer. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: