Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRWF1pN5rw=j1ia0x_9D1sSM8+Ex1U4RMS4j4L43WXAGw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > On 04/11/2016 03:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Now, I have produced two patches: >>> - 0001-Support-for-VS-2015-locale-hack.patch, which makes use of >>> __crt_locale_data_public in ucrt/corecrt.h. This is definitely an ugly >>> hack, though I am coming to think that this may be the approach that >>> would us the less harm, and that's closer to what is done for VS 2012 >>> and 2013. >>> - 0001-Support-for-VS-2015-getlocaleinfoex.patch, which make use of >>> GetLocaleInfoEx, this requires us to lower a bit the support grid for >>> Windows, basically that's throwing support for XP if compilation is >>> done with VS 2015. >>> Based on my tests, both are working with short and long local names, >>> testing via initdb --locale. >> >> The first patch is actually not what I wanted to send. Here are the >> correct ones... > > I think I prefer the less hacky solution. OK, at least we go in one direction. > Progress report: > > 1. My VS 2015 installations (I now have several) all generate solution file > with: > Microsoft Visual Studio Solution File, Format Version 12.00 > so I propose to set that as the solution file version. I am wondering why it happens this way for you.. > 2. The logic in win32.h is a bit convoluted. I'm going to simplify it. OK. Should I wait for a patch to look at then? > 3. I'm going to define _WINSOCK_DEPRECATED_NO_WARNINGS to silence some > compiler bleatings about the way we use the Winsock API Agreed here. I saw those warnings as well. > 6. most importantly, on my Release/X64 build, I am getting a regression > failure on contrib/seg. regression diffs attached. Until that's fixed this > isn't going anywhere. Hm. I am now looking at that, and I can reproduce the failure... I will send a patch soon. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: