Re: SIGHUP not received by custom bgworkers if postmaster is notified

<div dir="ltr">Thanks for committing the fix!<br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr
11,2013 at 4:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alvherre@2ndquadrant.com"
target="_blank">alvherre@2ndquadrant.com</a>></span>wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
0px0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Michael Paquier escribió:<br /><div
class="im">>Hi all,<br /> ><br /> > Please find attached a simple example of bgworker that logs a message
each<br/> > time a SIGTERM or SIGHUP signal is received by it:<br /> > - "hello signal: processed SIGHUP" when
SIGHUPis handled by my example<br /> > - "hello signal: processed SIGTERM" when SIGTERM is handled by my example<br
/><br/></div>I committed some improvements to worker_spi this morning that I think<br /> enough demostrate signal
handlingcapabilities, which I think is what<br /> your submitted code would do.  If you see more use for a separate
body<br/> of sample worker code, by all means do submit that.<br /></blockquote></div>Sure.<br />-- <br />Michael<br
/></div></div>