Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
>>
>>>> (2a) remove double stuff, just keep integer functions.
>>>>      I would rather keep min/max, though.
>>>
>>>
>>> (2a) sounds like a fine plan to get something committable. We could keep
>>> min/max/abs, and remove sqrt/pi. What's actually the use case for debug? I
>>> cannot wrap my mind on one?
>>
>>
>> It was definitely useful to debug the double/int type stuff within
>> expressions when writing a non trivial pgbench script. It is probably less
>> interesting if there are only integers.
>
> OK for me. Let's leave without it as well if you think it is not that
> useful. It could still be introduced later on.

s/leave/live. This morning is a bit hard...
-- 
Michael