Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes

<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Vik
Fearing<span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vik.fearing@dalibo.com"
target="_blank">vik.fearing@dalibo.com</a>></span>wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 04/30/2014 11:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:<br /> > We
reallyoughta fix the WAL situation, not just band-aid around it.<br /><br /></div>After re-reading this thread, it is
notclear that anyone is going to<br /> work on it so I'll just ask:<br /><br /> Is anyone working on this?<br /><br />
Ifnot, I'd like to put it on my plate.<br /></blockquote><div class="h5">Vik, did you get time to look at that
finally?<br/></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">Regards,<br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">-- <br
/>Michael<br/></div></div>