Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRM73BE7ou84BZ0OWU6r9uwHzXbhjXxhTwoBgpe54y50Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Improving test coverage of extensions with pg_dump  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> Note as well that I will be fine with any decision taken by the
> committer who picks up this, this test case is useful by itself in any
> case.

And I just recalled that I actually did no tests for this thing on
Windows. As this uses the TAP facility, I think that it makes most
sense to run it with tapcheck instead of modulescheck in vcregress.pl
because of its dependency with IPC::Run. The compilation with MSVC is
fixed as well.
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Explanation for intermittent buildfarm pg_upgradecheck failures
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: nodes/*funcs.c inconsistencies