Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRLYhWMw2w4nw25QZc3Y9fSbUToYfQMCjEFs6=vrVK9wg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Attached patch per Tom Lane proposal. > > * multiple -c -f options are supported, the order of options is respected > * the statements for one -c options are executed in transactions > * Iacob's doc patch merged enum _actions{ ACT_NOTHING = 0, - ACT_SINGLE_SLASH, ACT_LIST_DB, - ACT_SINGLE_QUERY, - ACT_FILE + ACT_FILE_STDIN}; Removing some items from the list of potential actions and creating a new sublist listing action types is a bit weird. Why not grouping them together and allow for example -l as well in the list of things that is considered as a repeatable action? It seems to me that we could simplify the code this way, and instead of ACT_NOTHING we could check if the list of actions is empty or not. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: