Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqRLWm+dD_uX1MC88FgEEW=b_T8X_95e=Kes9bg2zQ2EQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> There are just as many people that are running with scissors that are now >> running (or attempting to run) our elephant in production. Does it make >> sense to remove fsync (and possibly full_page_writes) from such a visible >> place as postgresql.conf? > > -1 > > Anyone turning off fsync without even for a moment considering the > consequences has only themselves to blame. I can't imagine why you'd > want to remove full_page_writes or make it less visible either, since > in principle it ought to be perfectly fine to turn it off in > production once its verified as safe. -1 for its removal as well. It is still useful for developers to emulate CPU-bounded loads... -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: