Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
| От | Michael Paquier | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqREf05cC=zs96Bgg+qQsx2T_YLu4Zz+cpYoOLcbBYVh7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:10 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >> I put the function evaluation in a function in the attached version. > > Thanks, this makes the code a bit clearer. OK, so I had an extra look at this patch and I am marking it as ready for committer. A couple of things to be aware of, and the result of this thread with the patch in its current state: - The patch is keeping \setrandom. Fabien and I are agreeing to purely remove it, though it is kept in the patch because it is easier to remove existing code rather than add it again per Fabien's concerns. - INT64_MIN / -1 throws a core dump, and errors on HEAD. I think this should be fixed, Fabien does not. - There are not many overflow checks for the exiting int64 operators and functions. HEAD doesn't do much, this patch makes it the situation a bit worse even if there are a couple of checks for int() for example. We do not do any checks for sqrt(-N) (N > 0) for example. - It may be more interesting to have the function execution code into a separate file for clarity. Not mandatory though. Except those comments, all the other issues have been addressed. I think this is a great patch, and greatly improves the extensibility of pgbench. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: