Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqR8rHg-nqLWcEtPn0Nhrn4DS8Jzue1u4VAWx2O493PtrQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes ("Syed, Rahila" <Rahila.Syed@nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Syed, Rahila <Rahila.Syed@nttdata.com> wrote: > Don't we need to initialize doPageCompression similar to doPageWrites in InitXLOGAccess? Yep, you're right. I missed this code path. > Also , in the earlier patches compression was set 'on' even when fpw GUC is 'off'. This was to facilitate compression ofFPW which are forcibly written even when fpw GUC is turned off. > doPageCompression in this patch is set to true only if value of fpw GUC is 'compress'. I think its better to compressforcibly written full page writes. Meh? (stealing a famous quote). This is backward-incompatible in the fact that forcibly-written FPWs would be compressed all the time, even if FPW is set to off. The documentation of the previous patches also mentioned that images are compressed only if this parameter value is switched to compress. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: