Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqR7UkYAhiFu=-W6M30Ku-9zSFPQerT1LDLwktyAXzLBQA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Thank you for looking on this and the comment. > > At Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:00:32 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote in <CAB7nPqQ69EPZkOqHAVuZXPxNzb_c2R5hs88tedLYqU9=Zu6xOw@mail.gmail.com> > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > > <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > > What do you think about this solution? > > > > <please do not top-post, it breaks the logic of the thread> > > I believe I haven't ripped off any in CC: list or In-Reply-To and > References in the previous post. (I read "top-post" as a post > without these headers.) Could you let me know how the message > was broken? 20151126.144512.10228250.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp just did that when you sent this new patch series: A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#idp55416272 -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: