Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqR73MP3iHjx-K7GFoMnwu6Ed4mYryE-OE5gt8T+-UHn3Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres
FDW
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita >> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Attached is an updated version of the patch, which modified Michael's >>> version of the patch, as I proposed in [1] (see "Other changes:"). I >>> modified comments for pgfdw_get_result/pgfdw_exec_query also, mainly because >>> words like "non-blocking mode" there seems confusing (note that we have >>> PQsetnonbloking). >> >> OK, so that is what I sent except that the comments mentioning PG_TRY >> are moved to their correct places. That's fine for me. Thanks for >> gathering everything in a single patch and correcting it. > > I have committed this patch. Thanks for working on this. Sorry for the delay. Thanks for the push. open_item--; -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: