Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqR+VY+RFbKvFGbXV_Y=ysw2FRApZEpoe7PxBn812kAeMA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02 (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> > @Magnus: having the possibility to mark a patch as "returned with >>> > feedback" without bumping it to the next CF automatically would be >>> > cool to being moving on. >>> Meh. "cool to have to help moving on". >>> >> >> Yeah, it's at the top of my list of priorities once I get some time to >> spend on community stuff. Hopefully I can get around to it next week. There >> is a small chance I can do it before then, but it is indeed small... > > > My apologies for that being delayed even longe rthan that. I've finally > pushed the changes that: > > * Renames the current "returned with feedback" to "moved to next cf" > * Adds a new status, "returned with feedback", that is the same as > "rejected" in everything except the label (meaning it closes the patch out, > but does *not* move it to the next CF). > > This was at least my understanding of the consensus :) Thanks a lot for this! This looks neat to me. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: