Re: [GENERAL] Backup strategy using 'wal_keep_segments'
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Backup strategy using 'wal_keep_segments' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQxufdSgHmP8BB+Stbqg9m-1cA4YpS1TTeT0PRFQjnA3Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [GENERAL] Backup strategy using 'wal_keep_segments' (Rhhh Lin <ruanlinehan@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Backup strategy using 'wal_keep_segments'
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Rhhh Lin <ruanlinehan@hotmail.com> wrote: > Is this approach feasible? Assuming obviously, we have sufficient disk space > to facilitate 1000 WAL files etc. You expose yourself to race conditions with such methods if a checkpoint has the bad idea to recycle past segments that your logic is copying. So I would advise to not do that. Instead of using the archive command, you should also consider using pg_receivexlog combined with a replication slot. This brings way more control with the error handling. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: