Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQuvRZtz0rpPR0DKEb=mKjioTPFZdpPiqW1O16TsDZ7og@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Make the optimiser aware of partitions ordering (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote: >>> That's true, but numCols, sortColdIdx etc are also used to display the >>> sort key in an explain. If an append can return sorted data, it >>> should also display the sort information, so I think these fields are >>> still required in an Append node. >> >> I don't think so. An index scan doesn't output that information, nor >> does a nested loop which inherits a sort order from its outer path. I >> think the rule is that a plan node which takes steps to get the data >> into a certain order might want to output something about that, but a >> plan node which somehow gets that ordering without taking any explicit >> action doesn't print anything. > > Oh, ok that indeed makes sense. As I said I'll remove all the useless > noise and send an updated patch. Thanks again. Waiting for a patch update for two months now, so marked as returned with feedback. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: