Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqQr7apg8W+p41W1azTjy7LSasSEvWvKePTU4knnxWCZkw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete >>> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind? > >> Isn't that to facilitate commands appended after CREATE SCHEMA? Say >> table foo is in schema1, and creating it in schema2 gets easier with >> tab completion? > > Seems like pretty much of a stretch. I've never done anything like > that, have you? Never, but that was the only reason I could think about. I recall reading something else on -hackers but I cannot put my finger on it, nor does a lookup at the archives help... Perhaps that's the one I just mentioned as well. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: